Open Relationships compared with OkCupid
OkCupid does more for non-monogamous users than any other mainstream dating site, and that is exactly why the comparison is worth making carefully. A good filter on a large monogamous population is not the same thing as a non-monogamous population.
How to read this
We built one of the two products being compared, so treat this as an argued case rather than a neutral review. Everything said about the other platform here is drawn from its own public description of itself and from what members tell us about using it. We do not link to competitors, and their details change, so check anything that matters to you directly with them.
OkCupid deserves credit here
Of the large mainstream dating platforms, OkCupid has gone furthest to accommodate non-monogamous users. Members can identify as monogamous or non-monogamous, can choose whether their search results include only non-monogamous people or show them exclusively, and can filter by whether someone is single or partnered. Used properly, those settings turn a general dating site into something that functions much closer to a non-monogamy platform.
It also has roughly fifty million users, a figure that dwarfs any dedicated non-monogamy app. In a smaller city, that difference in raw numbers is not something a specialist platform can argue away.
Where we differ
| Open Relationships | OkCupid | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | Non-monogamous by design, every member has stated a structure | Very large general dating population with non-monogamy filters available |
| What the filter does | Nothing to filter, the population is already the population | Narrows a mostly monogamous user base |
| Couples | Linked partner profiles, visible as a pair, separate accounts | Individual accounts, partnered status is a field |
| Profile depth on structure | Arrangement, agreements and capacity as primary fields | Relationship type and partnered status, with detail left to the bio |
| Moderation context | Team briefed specifically on ethical non-monogamy | General dating moderation across a broad user base |
| Local knowledge | Country and city pages covering how each scene is organised | Location as a search parameter |
The filter problem
This is the whole argument, so it is worth stating carefully. A filter changes what you see. It does not change the culture of the platform, the assumptions built into the product, or the behaviour of the people you match with.
In practice that produces a few recurring frustrations that members describe consistently. A person can identify as non-monogamous in their settings and still be looking for a single exclusive partner eventually, because the field captures a self-description rather than a commitment. The surrounding norms are still monogamous, so the disclosure conversation reappears in slightly different form. And a couple cannot really exist on the platform as a couple, because the product is built around individual accounts pursuing individual matches.
The self-description gap
The single most common complaint we hear about non-monogamy filters on general platforms is people who selected the option without having thought about it, or who mean by it something the other person does not. A field that is easy to tick is a field that gets ticked casually.
The honest case against us
Numbers, and it is not close. OkCupid's user base is vastly larger than ours or any specialist platform's, and in a mid-sized city that can be the difference between having options and not. If you live somewhere without a local non-monogamous community, a big platform with good filters may genuinely serve you better than a small platform with perfect ones.
OkCupid's question-and-match system is also a real strength that we do not attempt to replicate. For people who like a data-led approach to compatibility, it does something our profile-led approach does not.
The moderation difference
This is the least visible difference and one of the more consequential. A general dating platform moderates at enormous scale across an overwhelmingly monogamous user base, and its policies are necessarily written for that population. A report that says someone is married is, in that context, usually a report about deception.
On a platform where most members are partnered by design, the same report means almost nothing on its own, and treating it as a red flag would remove a large share of the legitimate membership. What actually needs catching is different: people whose partner does not know, couples misrepresenting whether both of them are participating, and the specific pressure tactics that solo members encounter from couples.
That is a narrower and more particular job, and it is one you can only really do if the team understands the difference between ethical non-monogamy and infidelity as a working distinction rather than as a policy line. It is the thing a filter setting cannot supply, and it is the argument for a specialist platform that has nothing to do with pool size.
Who should choose which
- Choose a large general platform with filters if you live outside a metropolitan area, if raw pool size is your binding constraint, or if you want a data-led matching system.
- Choose a specialist platform if you are in an established structure, if you are searching as part of a couple, or if you are tired of the disclosure conversation reappearing in a slightly different costume.
- Use both if neither of those describes you cleanly, which is the honest answer for a lot of people.
For background before deciding, ethical non-monogamy explained covers the terminology and how to ask your partner covers the conversation that usually precedes any of this.
How we compare to other apps
Honest, unlinked comparisons against the platforms non-monogamous people actually use.
Open Relationships and OkCupid
Is OkCupid good for non-monogamous dating?
It is the best of the large mainstream platforms for it. Members can identify as monogamous or non-monogamous, can restrict search results to non-monogamous people, and can filter by partnered status. The limitation is that a filter narrows a mostly monogamous population rather than starting from a non-monogamous one.
What can a non-monogamy filter not do?
It cannot change the culture of the platform, the assumptions built into the product, or the behaviour of people you match with. A person can select the option without having thought it through, and a couple cannot really exist as a couple on a product designed around individual accounts.
Does OkCupid have more users than Open Relationships?
Considerably more. OkCupid has roughly fifty million users, a figure no dedicated non-monogamy platform approaches. In a smaller city that difference in raw numbers can outweigh every product-level argument.
Should I use a general site or a specialist one?
A large general platform with good filters makes sense if you live outside a metropolitan area or if pool size is your binding constraint. A specialist platform makes more sense if you are in an established structure, searching as part of a couple, or tired of the disclosure conversation.
We build one of the products described on this page. Details of other platforms change frequently, and nothing here should be treated as a current statement of their features. Check anything important with them directly.
Find your plus-one, two, or three
Join a community where you are not filtering a monogamous population, you are searching a non-monogamous one.
Join